Georgia Trial Lawyer Blog

A Bibb County jury has determined that a nurse negligently administered pain medication which resulted in the death of a Warner Robins patient. The jury returned a $1 million verdict in favor of the patient’s family after deliberating for four hours.

The Macon Telegraph has the story.

The patient, Mearlene Hall, had a surgically implanted pump designed to administer pain medication. The pump had been implanted after she suffered serious back injuries. In May of 2006, a nurse from Option Care of Middle Georgia was refilling the pump with pain medication when Mearlene complained of a tingling sensation in her fingers. Despite Mearlene’s complaints, the nurse continued the procedure. Mearlene eventually went unconscious and slipped into a coma. She died 25 days later.

The family’s personal injury lawyer, Tim Hall of Macon, was able to convince the jury that the nurse was negligent for continuing the procedure after Mearlene began to complain. Hall presented evidence that tingling of the fingers is a sign of a pain medication overdose. He also showed the jury that the pump was working properly.

Aside from the $1 million verdict, prejudgment interest was also awarded in the amount of $278,321.

For years, our personal injury attorneys have been helping injured patients and their families recover damages from negligent health care providers. In many of these cases, a nurse or physician does not recognize or simply overlooks obvious warning signs. Patients who have been negligently injured can recover damages for medical bills as well as pain and suffering. If a death results, a patient may be able to recover for wrongful death which is the full value of the patient’s life. As in this case, damages can be significant.

Victims of Georgia peanut butter contaminated with Salmonella angered over lack of prosecutions

FBI agents raided two peanut butter plants in Blakely, Georgia nearly a year ago after a Salmonella outbreak was linked to the plants’ peanut butter. The outbreak killed nine people and sickened hundreds of others. However, not a single executive of the company, Peanut Corp. of America, has been charged with a crime. The lack of prosecutions has caused a stir among many victims and their families.

The Atlanta Journal Constitution has the story.

The evidence seemed overwhelming. FDA inspectors found mold, a leaky roof and cockroaches at the Blakely plants. Congress also found e-mails written by the company’s top executive, Stewart Parnell, which suggested putting profits above safety even after being aware of the contamination. Specifically, emails from Parnell revealed that he “desperately” needed to turn the peanuts on the floor into money. Parnell also instructed his plant manager to “turn them loose” which referred to peanuts that had tested positive for contamination but were cleared in a second test. When a final lab test revealed salmonella, Parnell voiced great concern to his plant manager over the amount of money that would be lost.

The lack of prosecutions has surprised many. Some have speculated that the delay may be due to the fact that the outbreak has been controlled and the plants closed. The acting U.S. Attorney for the Middle District of Georgia, G.F. Peterman, has refused to comment on the matter. Historically, prosecutors have been hesitant to bring charges in contaminated food cases. In the 2006 tainted spinach scare, prosecutors did not pursue convictions even though three died and 200 were harmed. When prosecutions do occur, companies are typically charged with misdemeanor offenses and receive fines. For instance, Sara Lee Corp. pleaded guilty in 2001 to selling meats contaminated with Listeria which killed 15. The company was fined $200,000 and agreed to hand over $3 million for food safety research. So far Peanut Corp. of America has only suffered a barrage of civil lawsuits.

Our personal injury attorneys have successfully represented several clients who have been harmed due to defective or contaminated products. In our experience, a victim’s best chance for holding a food company accountable for injuries is through a civil suit as many of the victims in this case have done. Georgia law contains several statutes which allow injured consumers to go after companies responsible for contaminated food. From the corporate farmer to the owner of a restaurant or grocery store, Georgia’s laws cast a wide net of liability on those involved in food production, manufacturing and distribution. In addition to food borne illnesses, a consumer may also have a cause of action for food containing unsafe levels of pesticides, foods whose poor quality is concealed, foods that are unfit for human consumption or that have not been handled properly and foods that contain foreign objects. In many of these cases, the consumer can recover substantial monetary damages.

Pate & Brody is an accomplished Georgia law firm with offices in Atlanta, Macon and Madison. Our lawyers are dedicated to pursuing justice for crime victims, people who have been defrauded by deceptive business practices, or injured through the fault of others. Our lawyers have been recognized on the list of Georgia's "Super Lawyers", and included among Georgia's "Legal Elite" by Georgia Trend Magazine.

A 33-year-old woman claims that a former nurse at The Medical Center of Central Georgia sexually assaulted her. The former nurse, James Melvin Purvis, was arrested on March 30 and indicted this week for sexual assault.

The Macon Telegraph has the story.

The victim was a patient at the hospital after she suffered injuries in a car accident. Purvis, 56, had previously cared for the victim; however, on the day of the assault, he was not scheduled to be her nurse. The victim stated that on that day Purvis came to see her and they started talking. As they conversed, Purvis allegedly rubbed her shoulder and fondled her. When the victim attempted to stop Purvis, he kissed her on the lips.

Police report that Purvis admitted to visiting the woman, rubbing her shoulders, and kissing her. Purvis faces a possible 10 to 20 years in prison if he is convicted of the sexual assault. According to the hospital, Purvis is no longer an employee, but it is unknown if the hospital fired him.

This criminal prosecution may also lead to a civil suit against the nurse and the hospital. A good crime victim lawyer can help a sex crime victim pursue her attacker in civil court and, in some cases, recover significant damages. The hospital's liability in a case like this will depend on its knowledge of this nurse's prior history, and whether this assault was foreseeable.

Pate & Brody is an accomplished Georgia law firm with offices in Atlanta, Macon and Madison. Our lawyers are dedicated to pursuing justice for crime victims, people who have been defrauded by deceptive business practices, or injured through the fault of others. Our lawyers have been recognized on the list of Georgia's "Super Lawyers", and included among Georgia's "Legal Elite" by Georgia Trend Magazine.

In May of 2008, a man working for a trusted cleaning company knocked on the door of a home the company had serviced on many occasions. The nanny, who was watching the family’s 3-year-old, let the man into the home where he proceeded to beat and rape her. The victims would later come to find that the man had previously been convicted of six felonies. The Georgia Legislature is now considering passing a bill which would require employers to conduct criminal background checks on employees who go into the homes of others.

The Macon Telegraph has the story.

The man accused of the rape, Rudolph Valentino Smith, had previously been convicted of crimes ranging from robbery to voluntary manslaughter. In fact, he had been convicted of killing a man with a butcher knife in 1994 for which he served 12 years in prison. Victim advocates say the proposed bill would reduce the chances of such an attack from happening again.

In addition to requiring background checks, the bill would prohibit some offenders from attaining jobs that send them into the homes of others unless their civil rights have been reinstated. The proposed bill has had trouble gaining traction, since many are concerned that such a law would harm the chances of rehabilitated felons from re-entering the workplace. Much of the criticism centered on the original bill’s exclusion of all felons; however, the revamped version only excludes those convicted of a crime which falls under the seven deadly sins: murder, voluntary manslaughter, rape, aggravated sodomy, aggravated child molestation, aggravated battery, and armed robbery if committed with a firearm.

The bill failed to leave the House Agriculture and Consumer Affairs Committee before the end of the 2009 legislative session, but it is expected to be considered again in January. The mother of the 3-year-old and owner of the home where the rape occurred, Amy Scott, has been an ardent supporter of the legislation and testified before the committee earlier this year. For now, she awaits the trial of the accused rapist while trying to put the events of that day behind her.

Our victims’ rights attorneys have successfully represented victims of serious crimes throughout the state of Georgia. In most serious crimes, victims are afforded certain legal rights including compensation, restitution, notification of criminal legal proceedings and restraining orders. A victim may also bring a civil suit against those responsible. Many times a crime will occur due to the negligence of an apartment complex, restaurant or similar business. A victims’ rights attorney will work closely with prosecutors and investigators in an effort to hold such businesses accountable.

Pate & Brody is an accomplished Georgia law firm with offices in Atlanta, Macon and Madison. Our lawyers are dedicated to pursuing justice for crime victims, people who have been defrauded by deceptive business practices, or injured through the fault of others. Our lawyers have been recognized on the list of Georgia's "Super Lawyers", and included among Georgia's "Legal Elite" by Georgia Trend Magazine.

The Georgia Court of Appeals recently determined that a plaintiff’s failure to originally identify the correct governmental agencies in a personal injury suit against the state does not necessarily constitute grounds for dismissing the suit. The court held that the correct standard is to determine if the plaintiffs adequately investigated their claims or if the state had suffered prejudice.

In Young v. Georgia Dept. of Natural Resources, the plaintiff, Young, was injured at the Georgia National Fairgrounds in Perry, Georgia. Young brought suit for negligence and filed ante-litem notices with the Department of Administrative Services and the Georgia National Fairground. This ante-litem notice is a necessary step in suing the state for a tort. Upon realizing these were not the correct agencies sometime later, Young filed suit against the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and the Georgia Agricultural Exposition Authority (GAEA) which were the correct agencies.

The DNR and GAEA asked for the case to be dismissed, since Young had failed to identify the DNR and GAEA as the target agencies as required by the anti-litem statute. The trial court granted the motion by reasoning that a plaintiff must strictly comply with the anti-litem statute which waives the state’s sovereign immunity. The court further explained that the failure to include the DNR and GAEA rendered the original anti-litem notices invalid, and the plaintiff could not remedy the problem by later attaching the correct agencies.

The Court of Appeals disagreed. It held that the trial court should have conducted an inquiry into whether Young adequately investigated his claim or whether the state had suffered prejudice as a result of originally naming the wrong agencies. In doing so, the judgment was overturned and sent back to the trial court for the correct analysis to be conducted.

Pate & Brody is an accomplished Georgia law firm with offices in Atlanta, Macon and Madison. Our lawyers are dedicated to pursuing justice for crime victims, people who have been defrauded by deceptive business practices, or injured through the fault of others. Our lawyers have been recognized on the list of Georgia's "Super Lawyers", and included among Georgia's "Legal Elite" by Georgia Trend Magazine.